|
Post by Tampa Bay Buccaneers on Aug 25, 2013 3:13:32 GMT -5
Since that is not said anywhere in the posted rules, and Dolphins won every other auction on this site, I think you should do the right thing and give Seahawks this one. The right thing is for folks to post bids properly. The players' position, name & overall. Not, "oh just add this to my other bid." If you're bidding 2 players, place your 2 player bid. That's it. How hard is that when you're already copying and pasting one player? Everyone else knew to do that. Plus, Dolphins is correct "...if an admin makes a judgement call.. people need to adhere to it .. like it or not..." I believe you practice this very principle on your other sites that you actually do run, do you not? You chose, yourself, not to be an admin/moderator here Ravens, so with Saints not here, this was my judgement call to make and I made it. End of discussion.
|
|
|
Post by New England Patriots on Aug 25, 2013 8:08:05 GMT -5
I agree with Bucs. Without posting a full bid it makes it too difficult for other people budding after. It wouldn't make sense to have to read through the whole thread to figure out what the highest bid is.
|
|
|
Post by Baltimore Ravens on Aug 26, 2013 13:38:06 GMT -5
I agree with Bucs. Without posting a full bid it makes it too difficult for other people budding after. It wouldn't make sense to have to read through the whole thread to figure out what the highest bid is. I agree from this point forward, but not everyone here has spent 6 years on EA or the other hockey sim sites, thus they do not know there IS a "proper format". The rules should be clarified, and this should be corrected this ONE time, because Seahawks did nothing against the rules and a member who won about 14 players gets yet another. It's really the thing that is best for the site all-around, really.
|
|
|
Post by Tampa Bay Buccaneers on Aug 26, 2013 14:14:00 GMT -5
I agree with Bucs. Without posting a full bid it makes it too difficult for other people budding after. It wouldn't make sense to have to read through the whole thread to figure out what the highest bid is. I agree from this point forward, but not everyone here has spent 6 years on EA or the other hockey sim sites, thus they do not know there IS a "proper format". The rules should be clarified, and this should be corrected this ONE time, because Seahawks did nothing against the rules and a member who won about 14 players gets yet another. It's really the thing that is best for the site all-around, really. Again, this wasn't and isn't your decision to make Ravens. As I said, I made the judgement call myself because I am the only active admin right now since Saints is dealing with his new baby stuff. The facts are these: 1) Seahawks did violate the rules by not posting a proper bid. If we let it slide on this one, we have to let it slide in the future. Therefore, the right thing for the site is the decision that I did make on the issue and I have the backing of other moderators to support that. 2) That being said, this exact same ruling I would've made had it been any other teams involved. It's unfortunate that it happened to be Seahawks here due to the disagreement we had before, but that had no bearing on the decision I made whatsoever. 3) You chose not to be any sort of admin or moderator on this site, period. Therefore this is not an issue that should be concerning you at all. 4) I have my suspicions now that Seahawks is a well versed veteran on these sim sites due to a PM conversation I had with him about his warning I issued him earlier. So, at this point I'm not buying the "he didn't know" excuse cuz it's a load of crap. He knew.
|
|
|
Post by Baltimore Ravens on Aug 26, 2013 14:28:43 GMT -5
I agree from this point forward, but not everyone here has spent 6 years on EA or the other hockey sim sites, thus they do not know there IS a "proper format". The rules should be clarified, and this should be corrected this ONE time, because Seahawks did nothing against the rules and a member who won about 14 players gets yet another. It's really the thing that is best for the site all-around, really. Again, this wasn't and isn't your decision to make Ravens. As I said, I made the judgement call myself because I am the only active admin right now since Saints is dealing with his new baby stuff. The facts are these: 1) Seahawks did violate the rules by not posting a proper bid. If we let it slide on this one, we have to let it slide in the future. Therefore, the right thing for the site is the decision that I did make on the issue and I have the backing of other moderators to support that. 2) That being said, this exact same ruling I would've made had it been any other teams involved. It's unfortunate that it happened to be Seahawks here due to the disagreement we had before, but that had no bearing on the decision I made whatsoever. 3) You chose not to be any sort of admin or moderator on this site, period. Therefore this is not an issue that should be concerning you at all. 4) I have my suspicions now that Seahawks is a well versed veteran on these sim sites due to a PM conversation I had with him about his warning I issued him earlier. So, at this point I'm not buying the "he didn't know" excuse cuz it's a load of crap. He knew. Blah blah blah. My objection is not based on being staff or not. It's based on a member getting screwed. Read the rules, and clarify them for people, then we'll talk more.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 26, 2013 15:12:18 GMT -5
Kruze I've never been in a league with bidding. By if those are the rules that's fine with me and ill post them correctly next time
|
|